You Think NATO Is a Team Effort? The U.S. Pays for Most of It

You Think NATO Is a Team Effort? The U.S. Pays for Most of It

In a recent letter to Norway’s Prime Minister, USA President Donald Trump reignited global attention on NATO, Greenland, and America’s role in international security. While much of the media focused on the tone of the letter, there was an underlying point that resonates far beyond politics: the United States carries a disproportionate share of NATO’s financial and military responsibility.

Trump criticized NATO allies for not contributing enough to collective defense and emphasized that the U.S. has consistently provided far more resources than any other member. His mention of Greenland, highlighting strategic vulnerabilities in the Arctic, served to underline the broader theme: NATO’s strength relies heavily on American commitment, both in funding and in military capability.

A Historical Perspective: NATO From 1949 Onward

NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was founded on April 4, 1949, as a collective defense alliance to deter Soviet expansion after World War II. The core principle of NATO, outlined in Article 5, is that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. Over the decades, NATO has expanded to include 32 countries, with new members joining to strengthen collective security in Europe and the Arctic.

From its earliest days, the United States has been the backbone of NATO, both politically and militarily. During the Cold War, U.S. forces and nuclear capabilities formed the centerpiece of NATO’s deterrence strategy against the Soviet Union. Even after the Cold War ended, the U.S. maintained a large defense presence in Europe, reinforcing its central role in protecting the alliance.

Understanding NATO Funding

NATO’s finances can be divided into two main categories:

1. Direct contributions to the alliance’s common budgets – These fund NATO headquarters, joint operations, shared infrastructure, and programs like the NATO Security Investment Programme.

2. Indirect contributions through national defense spending – Each country spends money on its own military, which is then available to support NATO missions, exercises, and deterrence operations.

Direct Contributions: Small but Significant

The alliance’s direct common budget is relatively modest, totaling a few billion dollars annually. The United States contributes roughly 16% of this budget, making it one of the largest single contributors, but far from the sole funder. While important, this portion represents only a fraction of NATO’s overall defense capability.

Indirect Contributions: The Real U.S. Burden

Where the U.S. dominates is in indirect contributions. Essentially, the American defense budget supports NATO’s readiness far more than that of any other member.

In recent years, NATO countries collectively spend over a trillion dollars annually on defense. The United States accounts for roughly two-thirds of that total, meaning its resources, troops, and technology form the backbone of the alliance. Over decades, conservative estimates suggest that the U.S. may have contributed tens of trillions of dollars toward NATO-related defense efforts when adjusted for inflation and cumulative spending.

This figure isn’t about direct payments into NATO’s bank account. It includes U.S. military spending on forces stationed in Europe, nuclear deterrence, joint exercises, equipment, and infrastructure that NATO relies on. In effect, the U.S. maintains a readiness level and capability that no other single ally approaches.

Historical Patterns of Spending

Over time, the U.S. has consistently spent a larger share of its GDP on defense than most European NATO members. For example, during the 1980s, the U.S. spent nearly 7% of GDP on defense, while Western European allies averaged around 3–4%. After the Cold War, European defense budgets shrank faster than U.S. spending, even as NATO continued to operate and expand its commitments.

Since 2014, NATO has encouraged members to aim for at least 2% of GDP on defense. While European allies are gradually meeting that target, the U.S. still spends more in absolute dollars than most allies combined, both supporting NATO and maintaining global readiness.

Trump’s Letter and Its Relevance

Trump’s recent letter to Norway’s Prime Minister mentioned Greenland, Russia, and China, and tied these strategic considerations back to NATO’s responsibilities. While many focused on the unusual tone and personal grievances in the letter, the underlying point reflected a longstanding debate: has NATO become an alliance that fairly distributes the financial burden, or one that relies heavily on U.S. contributions?

The U.S. provides both funding and military capabilities that NATO could not match otherwise. From forward-deployed troops in Europe to missile defense, surveillance, and rapid-response units, American investment allows NATO to maintain readiness across multiple theaters, including the Arctic and Eastern Europe. Greenland, as Trump pointed out, may be geographically remote, but it is strategically significant, and its security indirectly depends on American forces and deterrence.

How the Burden Has Evolved Over Decades

While NATO allies have increased their defense spending in response to global threats, the U.S. share remains dominant. The table below highlights NATO spending trends over recent decades, showing the U.S.’s outsized role:

Percentages reflect U.S. share of total NATO defense-related spending, including forces, operations, and infrastructure.

Even as European members gradually increase defense spending, the U.S. continues to provide the majority of the alliance’s military capability and financial support indirectly.

The Bottom Line: NATO’s Backbone

So the next time someone says NATO is a “team effort,” it’s important to understand what that really means. In direct contributions, each member pays a share of the alliance’s administrative budget. But in terms of military strength, readiness, and global influence, the United States carries the lion’s share of the burden.

Trump’s letter may have sparked headlines for its tone, but it highlighted a reality that has existed for decades: NATO depends heavily on American resources, strategy, and defense spending. The alliance’s security, from Europe to the Arctic, is supported first and foremost by the United States.

While allies gradually increase their spending and meet the 2% GDP target, history shows that the U.S. has long been the central pillar of NATO’s strength, and that fact cannot be ignored when discussing burden-sharing, strategy, or global security.

In short, NATO may be a team, but one player has always carried most of the load — and that player is the United States.

ChatGPT Finally Remembers Everything You’ve Ever Said — And Shows Its Sources | Maya