The Traitors Finale: When Ruthlessness Triumphs Over Personality
Rachel and Stephen’s historic dual victory exposes the show’s uncomfortable truth about rewarding strategy over entertainment
The fourth series of The Traitors concluded Friday night with a historic outcome that simultaneously validated and exposed the fundamental tensions within the BBC’s reality phenomenon. Rachel Duffy and Stephen Libby became the first pair of Traitors to claim victory together in the UK edition, splitting the £95,750 prize pot after systematically eliminating every Faithful player in a finale that was equal parts strategic masterclass and deeply unsatisfying television.
The season delivered moments of genuine brilliance, reaching the dizzying entertainment peaks that have made Claudia Winkleman’s psychological warfare experiment appointment viewing for millions. Yet watching the finale unfold revealed something troubling about how the format inherently favors certain player archetypes while punishing others, creating a paradox where the most captivating contestants become the earliest casualties.
The Personality Penalty
Throughout the series, viewers witnessed a pattern play out with depressing predictability. Contestants who dared display memorable characteristics found themselves facing swift elimination. James brought bewildering logic and unpredictable decision-making that kept audiences guessing. Harriet delivered explosive confrontations that injected genuine drama into proceedings. Fiona somehow managed to embody both qualities simultaneously, creating compelling television with every appearance. Their reward for entertaining the nation? Rapid banishment the moment their personalities became too pronounced.
Instead, the final roster comprised two Traitors alongside Faithfuls who collectively uttered perhaps 500 words throughout the entire series. Jade defaulted to defensive positioning whenever questioned. Faraaz oscillated between prolonged silence and brief flashes of perceptiveness before retreating into muteness. Jack emerged from near-invisibility only three episodes prior, suddenly asserting himself like a background character unexpectedly thrust into a starring role. The contrast between these finalists and earlier eliminations couldn’t be starker.
This creates an uncomfortable viewing experience. The show’s format theoretically rewards shrewd observation and strategic acumen. In practice, it penalizes anyone interesting enough to draw attention. Players learn quickly that mediocrity provides camouflage, while charisma paints targets on backs. The result transforms what should be compelling psychological drama into a test of who can remain most forgettable longest.
Rachel’s Gravitational Dominance
Yet thank goodness for Rachel Duffy. Without her, the finale would have collapsed into tedious predictability. The Newry communications executive became the first female Traitor to both reach the final and claim victory, achievements that speak to her exceptional gameplay but also highlight how the format had previously excluded women from treacherous triumph.
Rachel didn’t merely participate in The Traitors; she fundamentally reshaped the game’s gravitational field around herself. Every strategic calculation, every alliance formation, every elimination ultimately traced back to her machinations. She transformed what might have been a straightforward deception game into something approaching ruthless artistry. Her influence was so complete that the entire series bore her fingerprints, for better and worse.
This dominance manifested most clearly in how Rachel orchestrated events even within the finale itself. Despite surviving a previous episode’s cliffhanger by the narrowest margin when she drew the shield from her chest while James faced banishment, Rachel immediately pivoted to aggressive campaigning. She worked tirelessly convincing anyone willing to listen that Jade represented a threat, deploying her supposed FBI training claims to analyze micro-expressions and behavioral tells. The fact that much of this expertise later proved exaggerated didn’t diminish its effectiveness in the moment.
The ruthlessness Rachel displayed became the defining characteristic not just of her gameplay, but of the entire season. She understood intuitively what the format rewarded and pursued that understanding with single-minded determination. Every move calculated, every word calibrated, every relationship instrumentalized toward the ultimate goal of victory. It was brilliant. It was effective. It was also somewhat chilling to witness.
The Pact That Held
Central to Rachel and Stephen’s unprecedented success was their unwavering alliance. Selected as Traitors by Winkleman from the series’ outset, they formed an early pact never to vote against each other and maintained that loyalty through to the end. This represented remarkable discipline in a game explicitly designed to erode trust and encourage betrayal.
Host Claudia Winkleman emotionally acknowledged their achievement, telling them “Two traitors but totally faithful to each other. You did it. You absolutely did it”. She later compared their partnership to Bonnie and Clyde on the companion show Uncloaked, though wisely avoiding the Romeo and Juliet comparison given that tragedy’s fatal conclusion.
Stephen’s loyalty particularly impressed given the immense pressure he faced in the finale’s closing moments. He held the decisive vote multiple times, consistently choosing to back Rachel despite visible internal struggle. After their victory, he acknowledged his doubts, admitting he had questioned whether Rachel would maintain their pact but ultimately couldn’t betray her despite the temptation.
This alliance fundamentally altered how The Traitors operates. Previous seasons saw Traitors inevitably turn on each other, recognizing that shared victory dilutes individual prize money. Rachel and Stephen demonstrated that cooperative treachery can succeed where paranoid individualism fails. They proved that trusting someone whose entire role involves deception isn’t necessarily irrational if both parties recognize mutual benefit.
Format Fatigue and Filler
Beyond the personality-versus-blandness dynamic, the season exposed other structural weaknesses. The mid-episode challenges continue plaguing the show, serving as momentum-killing filler that interrupts genuine intrigue. These sequences feel like padding designed to reach broadcast length rather than organic components enhancing the central premise. Watching contestants complete arbitrary physical tasks while the actual game sits frozen creates frustration rather than excitement.
New format tweaks similarly underwhelmed. The Secret Traitor revelation arrived too early, eliminating potential long-game tension. Secret connections between certain players fizzled without meaningful resolution or payoff. These additions felt like attempts to refresh a formula that doesn’t necessarily require refreshing, creating unnecessary complexity without corresponding entertainment value.
The Moral Ambiguity
What makes The Traitors fascinating yet uncomfortable is how it holds up a mirror to human nature and social dynamics. The show rewards traits we claim to despise in real life: deception, manipulation, betrayal, strategic elimination of perceived threats. Yet millions tune in weekly to watch these exact behaviors play out, simultaneously condemning and celebrating them.
Rachel’s victory feels almost Machiavellian in its implications. She recognized that personality makes you vulnerable and ruthlessness makes you successful. She understood that genuine human connection represents tactical disadvantage while calculated relationships provide strategic advantage. She internalized these lessons and applied them with devastating effectiveness. The fact that she became the first woman to win as a Traitor adds complex dimensions to the achievement, simultaneously representing gender equality in morally ambiguous contexts.
Looking Forward
As the series concluded, Rachel expressed relief at no longer needing to lie constantly, saying “I’m really looking forward to not having to lie”. The psychological toll of sustained deception clearly weighed on her despite the victory. This humanizing moment reminded viewers that behind the strategic brilliance lies a person who spent weeks suppressing authentic responses in favor of calculated performances.
The Traitors will return for a fifth series, along with another Celebrity edition. Whether producers address the format’s tendency to eliminate interesting personalities while rewarding strategic blandness remains to be seen. Perhaps they’ll view Rachel and Stephen’s victory as validation of the current structure. Alternatively, they might recognize that while their gameplay was undeniably impressive, the route to that endpoint eliminated too many compelling characters too quickly.
The show faces a fundamental tension: maintaining dramatic entertainment while operating a format that inherently punishes drama creators. Until this contradiction resolves, The Traitors will continue delivering brilliant moments embedded within increasingly predictable patterns, where personality becomes liability and ruthlessness becomes virtue. Rachel understood this better than anyone, and her triumph proves the point while simultaneously highlighting its problems.
BBC Announces Landmark Partnership to Produce Original Content for YouTube | Maya
